Following up on this, any TUs care to respond on this topic? Thanks, Taylor Lookabaugh
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 02:05, rafael ff1 <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/3/5 Taylor Lookabaugh <[email protected]>: > > I have orphaned the package[1] by the way, after updating and then > > realizing there was a better alternative PKGBUILD available yesterday. > > > > > > Taylor Lookabaugh > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 19:04, Taylor Lookabaugh < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> May [1] package be deleted and merge the votes and comments over to [2]? > >> > >> The reason is that [2] compiles straight from the source. > >> > >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37007 > >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40573 > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Taylor Lookabaugh > >> > >> > > > IMO, lib32-openssl-compatibility [1] should be deleted as the version > is the same. Also, the other one's name, lib32-openssl098 [2], is more > suggestive. > > Rafael >
