On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:55:38PM +0100, Ike Devolder wrote: > Op 15-03-12 18:27, Buce schreef: > > > > In that case, should it be marked as out-of-date since it doesn't compile? > > I'm assuming that function is meant for flagging PKGBUILDs that are lagging > > behind development, but I don't see any other way of marking the PKGBUILD > > as "broken". > > > > > >> > >> -- > >> Ike > >> > >> > > deleted > > -- > Ike >
There was a legacy libpng14 on aur. Why didn't anyone try that? cheers! mar77i
