@ngoonee my point is that if a user can edit depends=, he could also as well edit build flags.
@Det i dont think this is a good idea to ban users like this. someone mentioned that creating too many similar packages will create confusion. I dont think this applies to me. i already renamed the package to "google-chrome-no-gconf"; this is really clear and distinguishable from 3 other google-chrome packages. @everyone for people who read my last post, i just searched mplayer: mplayer-fribidi-pulse and mplayer-fribidi. you might think "why does these guys create new pkgbuild while mplayer in extra has all these features?" the reason is that "he feels he needs to", and i think this is enough. btw, there are many pkgbuild that are "out-of-date for a long time", "does not compile", "orphaned for years", or "has dead upstream". I think you should put effort on these packages. picking on the packages that are similar should be the last thing to work on. On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Det <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just came here to say I had a good laugh from all this. > > But the thing is that if we banned this guy all his other 12 packages[1] > would need new maintainers (they don't seem to be anything special, though. > His most voted package with 17 votes (no-gconf[2]) doesn't even require > maintenance). > > [1] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=taylorchu&SeB=m > [2] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36554 > > Det
