On 05/11/2012 09:33 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote: > #Please remove the following out-of-date/old versions of catalyst > #packages. None of them probably builds with the current stock kernels, > #and mostlikely need really old version of X.org > > [1]catalyst-beta > [2]catalyst-ice > [3]catalyst-leaked > [4]catalyst-old > [5]catalyst-switch > [6]catalyst-tp > [7]catalyst-utils-old > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31216 > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15482 > [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28842 > [4]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25105 > [5]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48208 > [6]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16406 > [7]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25106 Gone. > ===================================================================== > > #The following nvdia binary blob releated packages should be removed. > #Reasons include orphan, out-of-date, old (beta/testing) versions, which > #do not work with our current kernels, X.org or need some older gcc > #release. > > [10]cuda-beta > [11]cuda-sdk-beta > [12]cuda-toolkit-beta > > [13]cuda-old > [14]cuda-sdk-old > [15]cuda-toolkit-old > ##If needed the -old packages should be reuploaded as cuda2-X like done > ##with most other applications and as with the verison 3 branch of > #cuda(cuda3-X) > > [16]cuda-sdk-gcc34 > #Do we really need a version for gcc34? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [10]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48012 > [11]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47707 > [12]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47706 > > [13]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30504 > [14]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30506 > [15]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30505 > > [16]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26331 Gone. > ===================================================================== > > [20]nvidia-96xx-fbcondecor > [21]nvidia-96xx-ice > [22]nvidia-96xx-zen > #No maintainer and depend on the old kernel26 naming scheme, > #nvidia-96xx-all can build a package for any installed kernel. Merging > #to nvidia-96xx-all, instead of removal, might be the way to go. > > [23]lib32-nvidia-utils-96xx > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [20]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25475 > [21]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15440 > [22]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13901 > > [23]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32046 Gone. > ===================================================================== > > [30]nvidia-173xx-ck > [31]nvidia-173xx-fbcondecor > [32]nvidia-173xx-ice > [33]nvidia-173xx-lqx > [34]nvidia-173xx-lts > #Merge into [35]nvidia-173xx-all, same reason as with the 96xx branch. > #nvidia-173xx-all, is out-of-date but maintained unlike the others. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [30]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44381 > [31]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31986 > [32]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21059 > [33]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46877 > [34]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46112 > > [35]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32909 Gone. > > ===================================================================== > > [40]nvidia-256 > [41]nvidia-ck-256 > [42]nvidia-utils-256 > [43]lib32-nvidia-utils-256 > #If I undertood correctly from my googling, this is not an major version > #branch, which dropped support for old hw. At the moment of writing > #binary repo nvidia, has all of the same functionality + more > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [40]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42037 > [41]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43968 > [42]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42038 > [43]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43969 Gone. > ===================================================================== > > [50]nvidia-275xx > [51]nvidia-275xx-ck > [52]nvidia-utils-275xx > [53]lib32-nvidia-utils-275xx > [54]opencl-nvidia-275xx > #If I understood correctly my googling, this is older version of the one > #in binary repos (at the moment of writing), with the exeption of this > #being for X.org server 1.11. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [50]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52283 > [51]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55013 > [52]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52285 > [53]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52284 > [54]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52286 > > ===================================================================== I'm leaving these in there for now. There's recent activity and people seem to be using them. > > [60]nforce-nvsound > [61]nforce-nvsound-utils > #Some really old OSS sound driver for nForce 1/2 motherboards, support > #for them exist in kernel tree, accoeding to comments. > > [62]nvidia-builder > #Out-of-date, non maintained, we can easily manage without it too. Easy > #to remake if ever needed > > [63]rivatv-cvs > #Old kernel triver, last commit 4 years ago, I'd be suprised if it would > #build with modern kernel, without 5000 lines of patches ^_^ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [60]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6922 > [61]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6923 > > [62]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31604 > > [63]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9500 > > ===================================================================== Gone. > > [70]nvidia-beta-zen: badly out-of-date, no maintainer > [71]nvidia-ice-beta: -||- > [72]nvidia-tp: -||- > [73]nvidia-utils-glselect: -||- > [74]nvidia-utils-ice: -||- > [75]nvidia-utils-pselec: -||- > [76]nvidia-utils-sane: -||- > [77]nvidia-vs: -||- > [78]nvidia-xen > #out-of-date, no maintainer, does not build for xen kernel, but instead > #the one which one booted in. `uname -r` > > [79]nvidia-yi: badly out-of-date, no maintainer. > [80]nvidia-zen-stable > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [70]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13904 > [71]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20410 > [72]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14974 > [73]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35814 > [74]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50024 > [75]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35824 > [76]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29617 > [77]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45327 > [78]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13093 > [79]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37948 > [80]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30154 > > Gone.
Yay, that really cleaned up the nvidia packages. Thanks for helping out.