On 26 May 2012 15:01, Anton Bazhenov <[email protected]> wrote: > 2012/5/26 speps <[email protected]> > >> On Sat, 26 May 2012 18:21:13 +0600 >> Anton Bazhenov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hello. >> > >> > Please merge the 'maxreloaded' package [1] into 'maxr' [2]. They are both >> > for the M.A.X. Reloaded game, but: >> > [1] is outdated (latest version has been released in December); >> > [2] has a better name, so I adopted and updated it recently. >> > >> > I e-mailed the maintainer of [1] a week ago, but he didn't respond. >> > >> > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23046 >> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24250 >> >> Done, thanks. >> >> > Also there are two packages for the ASCII Invaders game: >> > ascii-invaders [3] - orphan and doesn't work; >> > and asciiinvaders [4], which is maintained. >> > >> > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 >> > [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54804 >> >> ascii-invaders is probably a better naming (what upstream suggested). >> >> Would you mind adopting and updating ascii-invaders, so >> an inverse merging could be done instead? (asciiinvaders -> ascii-invaders) >> >> Differently, please contact the actual asciiinvaders maintainer and >> ask him to adopt and update ascii-invaders. >> >> > -- >> > Best Regards, >> > >> > Anton Bazhenov >> >> >> - speps - >> > > I have already contacted the 'asciiinvaders' maintainer, but he ignored my > suggestion. And he is active, so I don't see any reason to adopt the > 'ascii-invaders' package. > > -- > Best Regards, > > Anton Bazhenov
I merged asciiinvaders into ascii-invaders. The asciiinvaders maintainer didn't respond at all. Also it was a newer dupplicate (asciiinvaders is from 2011 and ascii-invaders is from 2007). BTW: Someone already took over ascii-invaders.
