On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:23:40AM +0200, Jorge Barroso wrote: > 2012/8/6 Dave Reisner <[email protected]> > > > > > >I tend to think the former is a much better name than the latter. If the > > >browser is already I designed to be libre, why does it require the > > >statement in the name? > > > > Jaja you're right but I thought all the PKGBUILD around that name (i had to > rewrite it because the former didn't work) and forget to rename the > src.tar.xz package before uploading it. > But... if you like the former one I can do it again with that name, so... > remove iceweasel-libre then XD > > Thanks!
Always favor the upstream name. I've deleted -libre.
