-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Xavion <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi All, > >I had a feeling this matter would balloon out of proportion, so I took >a >screenshot of the comments <http://i.imgur.com/nA5cK.png> before they >were >deleted. After these, the next two were supplied by Alexander >(xyproto) >before he wiped them all. The first of these seems to be a bit >petulant in >my opinion. It looks like he became a bit peeved and intimidated when >I >mentioned being qualified. > >Alexander's (xyproto) first: > >> Your "well and truly qualified" statement is meaningless, unless you >are >> aware of the qualifications of the people you talk to here, which I >assume >> you are not. It's also offtopic. >> >> Fine. >> > >Alexander's (xyproto) second: > >> Removing all the comments, as they don't really add anything to the >> information about the package. >> > >@ keenerd >I didn't ignore your comment; I responded to it within a day. You then >ignored my comment! You should get your facts straight before >accusing. >By the way, thanks for attempting to pick faults with eight of my >PKGBUILDs >overnight. Forgive me for thinking that you've got even more spare >time on >your hands than Alexander does. Also, where does it say on the >ArchWiki >that small Bash scripts must be housed outside of the tarball? You've >made >this change to my >popular-packages<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/popular-packages/>PKGBUILD >without noting where it states that doing so is mandatory. I also >don't think this should have happened because Alexander (xyproto) >himself >wrote in the comments linked above that I didn't actually have to make >that >change! > >@ Dave & Xyne >I appreciate your balanced comments. It's good that you haven't taken >one >side of the story and discarded the other. I just want to note - for >the >billionth time - that I didn't disregard official guidelines in the >PKGBUILD. A full explanation of this is available in the >aforementioned >comments log. > >@ Alexander (xyproto) >It's pretty obvious to all but the bleakest of minds that you deleted >the >first round of comments because I defeated all of your arguments and >made >you look silly. There's no way you'll ever admit to this, which is why >you >simply deemed the comments irrelevant instead. Also, you have >carefully >dodged the matter of the second round of comment deletions. You've >only >elaborated about your decision to delete the first round, which wasn't >what >I was complaining about in the first place! My issue was that someone >then >deleted my next comment, which was the only one listed there at the >time: >"As I'm the author of this little script, I will always want it to >remain >in the AUR". It will be interesting to see whether you have the balls >to >admit to deleting this isolated comment as well. The next step would >be >for you to formulate a semi-plausible reason for doing so in an attempt >to >trick anyone reading this thread. > > >-- >Regards, Xavion. This is not a channel for personal attacks please do not try to make it one - -- Sent from my Android Phone. Daniel Wallace Arch Linux Trusted User GTManfred -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.0.8 iQFUBAEBCAA+BQJQ0EdtNxxEYW5pZWwgV2FsbGFjZSAoZ3RtYW5mcmVkKSA8ZGFu aWVsLndhbGxhY2VAZ2F0ZWNoLmVkdT4ACgkQX6XlVE8BDUicHwf+OE8t3LtF9oyK INqvnRFn0k7Lb0LJdg5IQI7DDnI4iYzd5+fWtXwn3J/GN/bGY7MjZXe5qFKvphMU 9Dh3/JC/1q6MyLmTYNvU53Il2Po8n0Ii808h0TMVbTvs/TmPrX/VBY2ElKnHpcH4 +/dd1UluJoKQgoDWwk1QIVfnHCTyPS4KSg1cH+43YouDd3IkeQtH2d3p+y4J3ALJ j9gAApENUF+nO0roWtpzV0WJvX3FBNET5F17J4rwvuvv3KV0rN/C/74k3zanMl1/ uXfpiM0elynkNTM5QqJj4gx8zYkt3NuIOG0GZXzpPWUfZuZJKxhR2WwX/1vttyss oN8p+GLn2w== =Bref -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
