On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:37:43PM +0100, Mika Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently maintaining the ninja package on the AUR [1]. Recently, > there has been an issue about which I'd like to ask for your advice: > > ninja contains an files for emacs to support edititng the rules files > of ninja. A user suggested that I compile the provided .el file to an > .elc file. I did that, but then other users complained about the > build-dependency on emacs. Now another user suggested that in the > PKGBUILD, I should check whether emacs is installed and only then > compile the .el file. I'm not totally opposed to this, but it feels a > bit strange that the package is different, depending on the system > it's built on. > > What would you do in this situation? > > Thanks in advance! > > Best, > Mika > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ninja/ ---end quoted text---
If GNU version is present, compile them in post-install hook. -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR
