On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:50:09AM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > I've post an updated PKGBUILD on fossil & fossil-fossil. > If you insist it should be rename to fossil-git, let me know, I'll upload a > new PKGBUILD.
Yes, please upload it with the right name; git packages should end with -git. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_CVS_%26_SVN_PKGBUILD_guidelines Please also do not top-post. > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Steel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:00PM +0000, Jonathan Steel wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:47:23PM +0800, Daniel YC Lin wrote: > > > > Could anyone help me to get the permission to adopt 'fossil'. > > > > I've created a 'fossil-fossil' PKGBUILD. > > > > > > You should not do this. Instead post a link to the updated PKGBUILD in > > > the comments. I will delete this duplicate. > > > > On further inspection, your package should be fossil-git. Please upload > > with this new name and I will merge it. fossil should follow the stable > > version. > > > > > > But, I want to adopt the 'fossil' too. > > > > I've reported the out-date and e-mailed the current maintainer, but no > > > > reply for at least one or two weeks. > > > > > > Check your sent items and reply once it has been two weeks with no > > > response. > > > > > > > (Check the outdate time, it is more than one month). > > > > > > There may be good reasons why a package has not been updated, so an email > > > to the maintainer is what we go on. -- Jonathan Steel
pgp3BRDp1uQCs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
