Ok, thanks for the feedback, and it's what I assumed would be the case and my reason for asking. I did wonder why there were packages in the AUR that linked to content without, apparently, having appropriate rights. To confirm that I understand this correctly:

On 20/01/13 08:45, Xyne wrote:
The PKGBUILD does not contain the fonts so it is not distribution. The fonts are downloaded directly by the user when the package is built. Unless the source of those files is somehow illegal (e.g. privately hosted non-free files that the host may not legally distribute) then there is no problem. Regards, Xyne

A PKGBUILD may link to legal sources, so for an Apple font package to be legal, its sources must be. I get that. But the sources I used are those in use by packages already in AUR so, if they aren't legal sources, this would make the existing AUR packages (macfonts and ttf-mac-fonts) bad too, right ?

So to review the legality of the package we need to look at its sources:

On 20/01/13 04:27, Kirill Churin wrote:
This package source links:
http://ompldr.org/vNXFlNA — illegal
http://invisible-**files.googlecode.com/files/**ttf-mac-fonts.tar.gz<http://invisible-files.googlecode.com/files/ttf-mac-fonts.tar.gz>
—
illegal
https://macbuntu.svn.**sourceforge.net/svnroot/**macbuntu/Macbuntu/fonts<https://macbuntu.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/macbuntu/Macbuntu/fonts>
—
illegal
1. http://ompldr.org/vNXFlNA

This is from package 'macfonts' in the AUR. From what I can tell it originated from http://ubuntu-debs.googlecode.com/files/macfonts.tar.gz via http://korben.info//des-polices-mac-sur-ubuntu.html who copied it onto a file host at http://ompldr.org/vNXFlNA. The source at http://ubuntu-debs.googlecode.com is no longer available.

2. http://invisible-files.googlecode.com/files/ttf-mac-fonts.tar.gz

This is indirectly from package 'ttf-mac' in the AUR. It isn't in the package itself but is directly linked from the URL given in the PKGBUILD's 'pkgdesc' entry (https://github.com/GutenYe/aur/tree/master/ttf-mac: at the bottom, there is a link "Wow, It's too complex, it there a easy way? sure, you can find a download link at http://code.google.com/p/invisible-files/downloads/list";).

3. https://macbuntu.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/macbuntu/Macbuntu/fonts

This is from package 'ttf-mac-fonts' in the AUR. This one presents the "Safari For Windows" license as applicable to this which I doubt is relevant.

I would say that, from a legality viewpoint, package 'ttf-mac' is the cleanest as it doesn't install anything without additional work on behalf of the user to provide licensed content themselves (although it does indirectly link to a dubious way of obtaining that content). The other, however, I would suggest are somewhat dubious and should, perhaps, be removed?

As I can't vouch for the sources used by the AUR packages that I based my package on, I won't publish my package to the AUR.

Many thanks for your comment and apologies if I've opened a can of worms ;)
John







Reply via email to