On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Stefan Husmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do not get your point here. Why should transmission-cli-svn be removed? > How can a package based on svn be aout of date? > Why not just orphan it? >
I tried to write a new version of the PKGBUILD, including a rename to transmission-svn-cli which I would have based on transmisision-svn and then saw that the diff to transmission-svn boils down to the removal of 6 lines. 6 removed lines (2 of which are msg calls) do no longer seriously justify the existence of a package imo hence I can no longer care about the so-called effort.
