On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:30:05PM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: > On 03/05/2013 11:21 PM, William Giokas wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:10:16PM -0500, Daniel Wallace wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:05:07PM -0500, Limao Luo wrote: > >>>And he's back, with another account [2] with an address on a > >>>different website (rmqkr.net, which redirects to the disposable > >>>email site 10minutemail.com). This is a waste of my time. Can > >>>someone respond to this thread so I know that a TU even knows about > >>>this? Also, I guess it's really a bot, since the flagging is done > >>>across congruent intervals (this time it's 1 minute between flags). > >>> > >>>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/9Pwrxb1/ > >>We are well aware of it. > >>https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2013-February/002371.html > >> > >>The problem is every time I suspend an account (after a patch that was > >>applied yesterday) now he gets logged out, the problem is it creates a > >>new account and starts tagging them out of date again. > >Captchas, man. Captchas. I know it will very very slightly inconvenience > >some people that have to flag a few packages out of date at a time, but > >really, it would only save us from crap like this. > > > Yeah, they mentioned that in the aur-dev conversation, among other > ideas like IP blocking (which actually sounds good, except more than > one person can have an IP, so I don't know how much that would work, > unless there is some timeout period or something for the block) and > repeatedly doubling intervals after successive flags that time out > after an hour (which, while annoying, doesn't seem like an enough of > a deterrent, but I could be wrong). > > Well, not much to do except wait it out, I guess. I just can't > remember which packages I have to update now.
ip ban doesn't work when they use tor -- Daniel Wallace Archlinux Trusted User (gtmanfred) Georgia Institute of Technology
pgpHIl_9sFGyq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
