Op zaterdag 23 maart 2013 17:51:42 schreef Xyne: > Xyne wrote: > >The discussion period for graysky's application is over. > >It's time for the TUs to vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=68 > > The voting period has ended. The finally tally was > > yes: 12 > no: 14 > abstain: 4 > > Quorum has been met. I am sorry to announce that the application has > been rejected. > > @graysky > I am genuinely surprised and disappointed by these results. I think > that you have demonstrated skills beyond several previously > successful candidates and your contributions are valued by many in > the community. I hope that this result will not leave a bad > impression. You may apply again after 3 months if you choose. > > > @TUs > Voting "no" rather than abstaining indicates that you have reasons to > reject the candidate. These should have been brought up during the > discussion period. If they are valid then other TUs should be made > aware of them and take them into account. If they are not then they > should be addressed. In either case they should be discussed. > > The discussion period for this application was relatively short with > very few participating TUs. The only real objections were raised by > Dave (who even admitted that he may be "old and grumpy") and they > were addressed without any further replies from Dave or anyone else. > I simply do not understand how so many of you could vote no without > raising issues during the discussion. Looking back through previous > votes there is no other vote with this level of participation that > has been split this close down the middle. > > There is no point in raising your objections now but I hope that you > do so next time. Voting is not an expression of personal opinion. It > is a means of quality control and I would say that it is your > obligation to participate in the discussion if you have opinions one > way or the other.
Then the only thing i can say is: I'm sorry i did not participate in the discussion. I only had a positive idea about graysky, nothing more nothing less. I'm also surprised he did not make it in. I'm also sorry for that. There is nothing else to say now: better luck next time, i will be happy to see you (graysky) re-apply for TU. Please do. > > tl;dr: wtf? > > > Regards, > Xyne -- Ike ps: for all the thunderbird users out there, i know my signature will not be valid. please use something that works like mutt, claws mail, kmail, whatever.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
