On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:06 AM, OmeGa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/03/13 (Tue) 19:38, Maxime GAUDUIN wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I adopted ruby-jist [1] not so long ago, but I'd like to ask for its > > > deletion now, in order to conform better to the package naming > > > guidelines for Ruby gems [2]. I've submitted a new package called > > > simply > > > "jist" [3]. I don't think merging is necessary in this case. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-jist/ > > > [2] > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines#Package_Naming > > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jist/ > > > > > > > Merged, thx :) > > > > Thank you. Following the same principle, could it be possible to merge > ruby-rhc [1] into rhc [2], please? > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rhc/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhc/ >
There you go, thx again. -- Maxime
