On 02/04/13 17:59, Jonathan Arnold wrote: > There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: > > copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ > copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ > > I think both have PKGBUILD problems, from dependencies (the Copy.com > software uses Qt4, not Gtk, for instance) to poorly formed PKGBUILDs > (one has just a package() method and one has just a build() method). > I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I > wouldn't pick one over the other right now. > > Any one with more PKGBUILD confidence want to step in? > > Also, if you're interested, sign up with this link and we both get an > extra 5gb(!) of cloud storage on copy.com: > > https://copy.com?r=NXWnIn > Imo the 'copy' package is perfectly fine. The other package installs in /opt which isn't needed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
