On Sunday 16 Jun 2013 11:50:29 Mark E. Lee wrote: > Why was the bluez-aur package removed from the AUR?
See: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-June/023875.html inlined below; On Sunday 16 Jun 2013 09:40:12 Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluez-aur/ > > "once bluez 5.0 is in the repos, please email aur-general and have this > deleted" --gtmanfred > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/bluez/ is bluez 5.5 Oh, I didn't know the repos were finally updated. Thanks! From, Mark -- Mark E. Lee <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
