On 19 June 2013 23:49, Doug Newgard <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> I don't think anyone's suggesting just removing them en mass, but removing
> them if upstream is gone, they don't build, and haven't been updated in a
> long time. In that situation, what would the reason be to keep them?
>
For example there might be some patches already applied which could
help a possible future maintainer to bring the package back to life.
And even if not, someone might find an application he needs through
our search and then adopt it. I sometimes do it myself, instead of
googling around for something, I go straight to yaourt -Ss with some
keywords :).
--
Pozdrawiam,
Karol Woźniak
aka Kenji Takahashi
@ kenji.sx
"Don't shoot the messenger."
