On 06/26/2013 10:46 AM, Rob Til Freedmen wrote:
There are 828 packages from 299 maintainers where category is set to 'none'
- another 209 packages are orphaned.
orphan - Buce
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=0
buhman - gtmanfred
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=250
gtmanfred - Perberos
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=500
Perberos - yhager
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=750
yhager - zosodk69
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?C=1&PP=250&SB=m&SO=a&O=1000
full csv list of packages with category=none (no orphaned listed)
http://sprunge.us/Necd
This top-20 list counting for nearly 50% of the packages
8 masterkorp
9 Huulivoide
9 zootboy
10 spider-mario
11 buhman
11 kevku
11 nbryskin
12 eworm
13 demonicmaniac
15 crocowhile
16 Mizuchi
16 t-8ch
18 taylorchu
21 chenxiaolong
27 Diego
32 gtmanfred
33 yhager
34 StefanHusmann
35 Perberos
43 Morfeo
full csv list maintainers with a count of packages with category=none
http://sprunge.us/BDFD
I think this has no priority but should be fixed nevertheless.
Holy crap, I am actually shocked that jnbek doesn't appear on that
sprunge at least once... out of almost 800 pkgs, I fig'd there would be
at least 1 without a category, I know there were like 3 that didn't have
a description and I think I got those fixed... but all mine with
categories, that blows my mind, lol...
--
John D Jones III
Perl/Javascript/Systemd Zealot
[email protected]
http://www.zoelife4u.org/
