I think that we should modify the convention so that it goes as icon-theme-*, gtk-theme-*, etc. so that it sorts better.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Agustin Ferrario < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri 28 Jun 2013 09:52:23 AM ART, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 10:44 +0200, Edoardo Maria Elidoro wrote: > >> Hi everyone, > >> I was wondering why a lot of icon themes in AUR have this "kind" of > >> name: $name-icon-theme. > >> I think it should be better if the guidelines would encourage a > >> cleaner (and IMHO better) format like: icon-theme-$name, just like the > >> gtk-themes in AUR. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> Maybe the guidelines already suggest something like this, I'm just > >> asking since I found A LOT of packages with that "kind" of name. > >> > >> Have a nice day, > >> Edoardo > > > > *-icon-theme seems to be the convention right now, but there is no > > guideline about this afaik. icon-theme-* might be a good idea, but we > > already have gnome-icon-theme, humanity-icon-theme and the likes in our > > repos. Unless you want to go on a crusade to change all the icon theme > > packages, I'd leave it at that, seems like too much wasted energy to me. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Maxime > > I think we should write it in the Arch Packaging Standards so they all > use the same convention >
