On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Stefano <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I made a name mistake and I propose to merge [1] in [2]: > > > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari/ > > IN > > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-kalahari-mod/ > > Wouldn't be more appropriate to call the package > libreoffice-kalahari-icons? Not everyone is familiar with the jargon. > A mod can be a myriad things; in fact the original meanings of mod and > modder are very different indeed (hint: modarchive.org). > > -- > http://about.me/palopezv
Thank you for your advice Alejandro. You are right, but if you look carefully you will se that every libreoffice icon theme (in AUR) are a mod to LO. That's because we move an icon theme to another name and install the icon theme (in this case kalahari) with the name of the moved theme. This are the examples: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-faenza-mod/?setlang=he&comments=all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-human-mod/?setlang=it the only name exception is: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libreoffice-flat-icon-set/ but in the libreoffice-flat-xxx.install you will see the same code i was talking about. I think that mod is more properly, because a part of LO will disapper and after an update of LO we need to reinstall the theme package. If you think anyway this name is wrong I'm open to do the right way.
