Yes, wxpython-devel would be even better. Oh, i didn't know that.
I'll upload the new package. 2013/10/24 Doug Newgard <[email protected]> > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:43:51 -0400 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request > > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:18:18 -0002 > > Ronnie Andrew <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/ > >> > >> This package should be renamed from "wxpython-2.4.9.1" to > >> "wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and > >> submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal. > >> > >> Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython > >> to a new version which should be deleted. > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/ > > > > Actually, there already is a wxpython in extra that does all this. It > > should be marked out of date, I would think. > > > > -- > > Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io > > > > If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you > > need a team ~ John Wooden > > > > No, the package in extra is the stable version, the AUR one is the > unstable development version. > > IMO, it should be wxpython-devel to keep with the accepted naming scheme. > > Ronnie, you need to upload the new package to the AUR then a TU can merge > the old package into it. They cannot rename a package. > -- *Ronnie Andrew* *Tecnologia em Análise e Desenvolvimento de Sistemas* *UNICAMP - FT*
