On Sunday, December 08, 2013 17:17:35 Jason St. John wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Jason St. John <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is an extension of the rename request for virtinst-current --> > > virtinst[1]. Based on some further research by djpohly, it was > > discovered that virt-manager-0.10.0-1 began providing virt-install[2]. > > > > djpohly offered that it might be useful to keep virtinst around > > because of all the dependencies that virt-manager pulls in. I thought > > about this for a bit and posted the following comment on the > > virtinst-current AUR page: > > > > "Are there many cases where virt-install would be needed without all > > of the extra dependencies on, e.g., some of the graphical > > tools/utilities? Just headless VM servers? virt-manager also installs > > the programs virt-clone, virt-convert, and virt-image, which seem > > quite useful even on headless VM servers. > > > > Unless virt-manager gets split into GUI and non-GUI packages, I don't > > see the value in keeping [the virtinst-current] package around. And > > even if [virt-manager] does get split into GUI and non-GUI packages, > > the non-GUI package would include virt-install anyway. So either way, > > I think this package can be safely deleted." > > > > As such, I am requesting that virtinst-current[3] be deleted. > > > > [1] > > https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-December/026311.html > > [2] > > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/virt-manager&id=5493fd016372532c5e90556e6ad5399b7e625a84 > > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtinst-current/ > > > > Thanks, > > Jason > > It seems like this was missed. Can a TU please handle this? > virtinst-current needs to be deleted. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtinst-current/ > > Jason
Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
