On Monday, December 23, 2013 00:10:40 Doug Newgard wrote: > **DELETE** > > Duplicate of mono-git: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-latest/ > > Renamed upstream to budgie, submitter/maintainer renamed package without > requesting merging/removal. Nothing useful to merge: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/music-player-git/ > > Maintainer said in the comments that the package is obsolete and needs to be > removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-themes-git/ > > Fix was implemented upstream, nothing worth merging: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen-bin-fix/ > > Merged into kernel source tree as of 3.8: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723ae-w110er/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtl8723e-w110er/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rtl8723e/ > > Out of date duplicate of sphinx, nothing worth merging: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sphinx-release/ > > Duplicate of volatility-svn, nothing worth merging: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/volatility-linux-svn/ > > Patch merged upstream, nothing worth merging: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zbar-v4l/ > > Duplicates of libpng and lib32-libpng. The submitter claims that they aren't > because it will stay at 1.6, but they're still duplicates : > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libpng16/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-libpng16/ > > Duplicate of tor in community: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-stable/ > > Duplicate of tor-unstable: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tor-rc/ > > **MERGE** > > Maintainer renamed package but never requested merging: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono3/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mono-beta/ > > Maintainer renamed package to comply with python naming standards, needs > merged: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pytorctl-git/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pytorctl-git/ > > **OpenSync** > > The opensync packages are kind of a mess. To start with, the tool was > renamed and needs merged: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-svn/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool-svn/ > Then we have an unstable, development release in [community] as libopensync > that complicates things. I'm thinking the best way to handle this is to > make the development releases the normal packages and the older, stable > release suffixed with -stable. With this in mind, libopensync-unstable is a > duplicate of the [community] package and needs to be removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libopensync-unstable/ > And the other unstable package needs merged along with the regular one, > taking into account the rename. > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool-unstable/ && > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/msynctool/ INTO > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/osynctool/ > I haven't looked at the plugins yet. OpenSync is mostly dead, anyway. > > Thanks > Doug Newgard (Scimmia)
All taken care of, thanks! Regards, Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
