On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:53:26PM +0000, Xyne wrote: > On 2014-01-16 23:24 +0100 > oliver wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I looked up some information... > > > >Axiom has been forked in 2007 into > >FriCAS and OpenAxiom. > > > >So, Axiom and OpenAxiom are the same. > > > >Nevertheless there are two AUR-packages with OpenAxiom, > >and the mentioned licenses (in the package description) > >differ. > > > >How will such a case be handled? > > > >Ciao, > > Oliver > > Hi, > > I have merged axiom-cas into open-axiom. The former package was outdated and > of > poor quality. [...]
OK, I see. But the package open-axiom-svn 1082-1 says, License is GPL2. looking up the License on the projects's homepage, I found " Modified BSD license". So, "custom" (because not BSD, but modified BSD) seems to be correct. See here: http://www.open-axiom.org/license.html So the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/open-axiom/ says "custom" license and the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/open-axiom-svn/ says GPL2, which is not correct. Is a comment to the maintainer and waiting for answer sufficient? Ciao, Oliver
