Hi On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Maxime Gauduin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Anatol Pomozov > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please remove a number of unused versioned packages: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-0.14.1/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-celluloid-io-0.14.1/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-coderay-1.0.5/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-equalizer-0.0.7/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-github_api-0.10.1/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-gssapi-1.0.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-httpi-0.9.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mime-types-1.16/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-minitar-0.5.4/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-mixlib-config-1.1.2/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-moneta-0.6.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-multipart-post-1.2.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-net-ssh-multi-1.1.2/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nori-1.0.0/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-puma-1.6.3/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-ridley-1.5.3/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubyntlm-0.1.1/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-wasabi-1.0.0/ >> >> Incorrectly named packages that should be removed as well: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-digital-ocean/ >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-exception-notification/ >> >> All nuked.
Thanks. A few more that I missed https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-excon-0.25/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-fog-1.15.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-memoizable-0.2/ >> please merge >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-sdl/ >> into >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-rubysdl/ >> > > What's the rationale behind this change? ruby-sdl is perfectly fine, > ruby-rubysdl is just silly imho. The gemname is 'rubysdl' http://rubygems.org/gems/rubysdl, the package name should be 'ruby-$gemname'. The question should go to upstream developers - why do they use "ruby" prefix in their gem names if the gems are for ruby only anyway.
