On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:30:01PM +0100, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Maxime Gauduin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Except I don't remember ever seeing a python-python-pyfoo in our > repos... > > We would, if python-pyfoo was the name of an upstream project. > > > > -- > > > Maxime > > > > > > > Also we add python in all cases to differentiate python 2 and python 3, > > there is no such problem with ruby... > > No, we add a python- prefix because that's our packaging guidelines for > language specific packages. The fact that ruby has no divergent branch > which requires separate packaging is irrelevant. > > The upstream project is called ruby/sdl. The gem is called rubysdl. It > seems to me that ruby-rubysdl is the correct name, even if it seems to > be redundant. > > I've merged ruby-sdl into ruby-rubysdl. > Fine, that call is not mine only anyway, I'll back off as promised since it appears I'm the only one to be bothered by this. I still think it is overly redundant, and like I pointed earlier, other distros like debian do too. And with that I'm out. Cheers, -- Maxime
