On Jan 22, 2014 2:03 PM, "Jelle van der Waa" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/22/14 at 08:54am, Andreas Radke wrote: > > I'd like to make use of libpaper in Ghostscript, Cups and LibreOffice. > > So I will move it to extra and will maintain it there. > > > > Also I was told that Callibre can make use of certain libraries in > > future versions that are already part of the internal LibreOffice > > sources. I will do some investigation and will decide if we make > > them system libs so we can do shared linking to these libs. > > > > Please have a look at the PKGBUILD, what internal sources we will use > > in LibO 4.2 : > > > > https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD.42?h=packages/libreoffice > > > > -Andy > > It totally makes sense to create packages for libraries which are used in Calligra and > LibreOffice. Creating packages for obscure libraries used only in > LibreOffice seems like an unnecessary maintain burden, I just wonder why > you don't use boost and rhino from our repos. > > When I used to contribute to LibreOffice, I've build flawlessly against > our repo's boost version. > > -- > Jelle van der Waa
I have to agree with this. My two cents would be on the basis of organization and consistency throughout the repository, although I'm likely underinformed.
