On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote:
Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer "project name" than "package
name proposed by the upstream". I have recently reported an issue
stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss
powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the
tarball is named upstream) to powerdns.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231
That's valid. I don't honestly mind. Though the lwks package in the ALUR
really needs to be updated to fetch the source from upstream (which it
currently doesn't do).
--
All the best,
Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)
