* Daniel Landau <daniel.lan...@iki.fi> [2014-02-13 10:00:52 -0600]: > On 2014-02-13 04:27, Florian Bruhin wrote: > >I'm the current maintainer of the pebble-sdk-beta[1] package. > > I don't have comments on your actual questions but I do have one of my own: > > [2] claims a license of GPLv3 and [1] claims MIT. I can't find license > information in the SDK tar balls but I do find binaries without > corresponding sources. What's the deal here? > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk-beta/ > >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pebble-sdk/
* Taylor Lookabaugh <jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com> [2014-02-13 08:10:02 -0800]: > I went as far as looking in the github repository and I'm guessing the > sdk-beta assumed MIT based on this[1] where it says all examples are > released under MIT License. > > [1]https://github.com/pebble/pebble-sdk-examples Yeah, this is just a best guess based on the examples license, and tools/LICENSE which also says MIT. Florian -- () ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail www.asciiribbon.org /\ www.the-compiler.org | I love long mails http://email.is-not-s.ms/ Really?? What a coincidence, I'm shallow too!!
pgpbR_kjhY9TE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
