On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Maxime Gauduin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche <[email protected]>wrote: > >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ >> >> Appears to be the same packaged data as >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ except it doesn't >> build properly. Note: I might be wrong on this, but I can't figure out >> how to make it build.
Not sure what your problem was.. I had it installed for some time and I'm sure I would have complained if there were problems. > I haven't tried building the fluidr3 package recently, but that sfark > format is a pain in the neck anyway. The fluidr3 soundfont from Not sure what you mean by 'sfark format' in this context - both install .sf2 Though, one installs it in upper case... > soundfont-fluid doesn't use that and comes with changes from the musescore Yes, a missing note (#94) - and soundfont-fluid should have added the Changelog.txt > guys, so it's actucally a more up-to-date version of the original fluidr3 > by hammersound. I'll merge fluidr3 into soundfont-fluid. Thx. But soundfont-fluid not only misses a Changelog.txt but also Fluid R3- Readme.doc and a proper url (still at "http://www.hammersound.net"; instead of "http://www.musescore.org/..."; *and* introduces blanks in the sound font file name "FluidR3 GM2-2.sf2" Look at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-fluid/ for complains.
