Ahh, okay, that makes sense. I thought that would be the case -- these guys 'n' gals are volunteers after all.
On 14/03/2014, Karol Blazewicz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, David Phillips <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Please excuse me if this isn't the right list for this (I feel >> confident it is), but is there any reason why is it that something >> that's as reasonably update- and maintenance-free as >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sl not in community yet? It's got >> over three hundred votes; is there a reason for it staying out of >> community? I can understand the viewpoint of it being such a small >> package that it's not worth the time and space on mirrors, but still? >> >> Wow, I'm proof reading this message just now and it sounds more >> demanding than intended. >> >> Cheers all >> -- >> David Phillips >> GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B >> Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B > > It's not exactly essential. If some dev or TU wants to pick it, he > will. People tend to maintain packages they use. > -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
