On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:00:46AM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:48:19AM -0400, Zack Buhman wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 09:52:17AM -0400, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Vincent B. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am the packager of aspcud and aspcud-svn, an important dependency > > > > solver for the OPAM OCaml package manager. > > > > > > > > Two dependencies, clasp and gringo, have been already packaged in AUR, > > > > > > Disowned. Adopt and keep improving it! > > > > This is what package-hijacking looks like. > > Is it? The previous maintainer has never voted, and their last action on > the AUR, as far as I can tell, was June of last year. The only remaining > package they have is out of date as of a month ago, in addition to clasp > and gringo. I don't think there's any unwarranted "hijacking" happening > here.
Unless I'm completely insane, you're talking about the submitter, not
the previous maintainer (me, though again I could be delusional)--as
far as I can tell, there is no (public) mechanism that reveals
intermediate {orphan,adopt} history.
pgpoP9HQt78h_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
