The following package:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bluecurve-cursor-theme/
conflicts with this package in the official repos:
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/xcursor-bluecurve/
But the AUR package provides extra variants on this cursor theme that
the official repos package does not provide.
The AUR package in question is currently orphaned. I'm happy to adopt
it, fix the pkgbuild and ensure that it only installs the variant themes
and not the main theme that the official package provides. In this case
it could be renamed to xcursor-bluecurve-extra or something like that?
Or should the aur package simply be deleted?
What should happen here?
- [aur-general] bluecurve-cursor-theme official repos confl... Charles Bos
-