Cool, didn't know packages could be merged. That would be great!
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-04-20 14:07, Jesus Alvarez wrote: >> Sorry for the lack of explanation. I maintain the zfs packages in AUR. >> The zfs, zfs-utils, spl, spl-utils packages have been replaced by >> zfs-{git,lts}, zfs-utils-{git,lts}, ... >> >> ZFSonLinux.org are slow to make official releases, but they have a >> stable master branch on git. The original zfs packages on AUR required >> too many patches to keep up to date with kernel API changes, so we >> decided to instead base the releases of of GIT and provide the LTS >> packages for people that don't feel comfortable using the git >> packages. >> >> The original zfs packages in AUR are no longer required and would only >> confuse users. >> >> Thanks, >> Jesus A. >> > > I belive that merging into zfs-git and zfs-utils-git would be the proper > action in this case, so as to keep comments/votes and notify users > who're subscribed. > > -- > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > A: No, it doesn't make sense. > Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply?
