On 2014-05-01 18:56 +0200 Sam S. wrote: >On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Arnold <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are 2 packages for the Copy.com client software package: >> >> copy - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy/ >> copy-agent - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/copy-agent/ >> >> [...] >> I'm not really sure how this should be resolved, mostly because I >> wouldn't pick one over the other right now. > >A year later, it's now clear that "copy-agent" is the package that >should be kept, since... > - it works > - it is well maintained (updates appear shortly after upstream releases) > - it even installs systemd units and browser plugins > >The "copy" package should be deleted, as... > - it is broken > - it has been flagged out-of-date for 10 months now with not reaction >from the maintainer > - it is badly named > >Can one of TUs please take care of this? >Thanks!
done, thanks
