Actually, in light of the information present at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman_GUI_Frontends I will retract my previous comment. Too many existing, working Gtk front-ends for me to bother with gtkpacman.
On 14/06/2014, David Phillips <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody > else is willing, I'll adopt it. > > On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard <[email protected]> wrote: >> This one might be a bit controversial. >> >> gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned >> since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this >> point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed >> IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 300 votes, but it's time is >> passed. >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtkpacman/ >> >> > > > -- > David Phillips > GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B > Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B > -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
