On 9 July 2014 21:28, Bartłomiej Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote: > If only you were curious enough to actually use musl at least once it > would be clear to you that the branch naming scheme used by upstream is > at least misleading. Whatever you do 1.1.x is newer than 1.0 and in > many cases is more useful. > > But sure, better whine about clang and make unrelated comparison to > developemnt of drivers in Linux kernel. Good luck, you are going to > need it a lot. > > -- > Bartłomiej Piotrowski > http://bpiotrowski.pl/
"treat others as you would be treated; respect them and their views, even if you disagree with them." - Arch Wiki Are you really that ignorant/stupid/insulting? Here let me help you: (from http://www.musl-libc.org/download.html) ----------------------- Current Versions Mainline - 1.1.3 Stable - 1.0.3 ----------------------- Oh! did I forget to mention that it helps if you use bother to use the search facility once in a while. Click this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/musl-latest/ ...and check the submitter/maintainer/packager Steven. (aka stevenhoneyman if you STILL haven't realised!)
