On 2015-02-06 12:30, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > >No client will help, because the mailing list erases the original > >Reply-To header, so it's impossible for the MUA to determine it. > > Some people, e.g. I, even don't set up a Reply-To. > > That's the from the list's headers of your mail: > > "Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:14:59 -0300 > > From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <[email protected]> > > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Email Notifications of new AUR > orphaning/deletion/merging method > > Reply-To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository \(AUR\)" > <[email protected]> > > Sender: "aur-general" <[email protected]>" > > If I push Claws' "Sender" button, the mail only would be send to > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <[email protected]>. > If I use Claws' "Reply" button, the mail only is send to AUR general. > > If I push Evolution's group reply button, the mail is only send to the > list. If I push Evolution's reply button, Evolution asks me, if I want > to reply to you or to Arch general. >
Evolution can try to *guess* where to send the reply, but the reply address that the author may have included has been purged forever and is irrecoverable by your MUA. Since there's already a Reply-to-all button, I continue to see the purpose of dangerously mungling the user's emails. It's a huge privacy hole. > In addition, both MUAs allow to reply to all. > > So I at least have got two MUAs installed that are able to handle this > "issue". > > Regards, > Ralf -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?
pgpDANZoNIQgN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
