* brent timothy saner <[email protected]> (Sun, 24 May 2015 21:05:22 -0400): >> But for now, I think it's not necessary, as the new site will be >> wiped before the mail will be sent, as far as I did understand >> earlier mails about AUR 4.0.0. Or isn't it? > > I'd have to check again- anyone else know off the top of their head if > this is true?
I searched through my mails and found this one: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2014-December/003014.html In there Lukas said that AUR maintainers have to co-maintain packages on the new and the old site simultaneously, but that's no longer the case. As far as I can see he wanted to wipe current aur-dev/aur4. Best, Marcel
pgpZr_jtNihfX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
