* Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> (Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:08:00 +0200): > when using the AUR 4 search machine for "Name, Description" or "Name" > and "Out of Date All", the keyword "lightscribe" does find "4l", but > it doesn't find "lightscribe" and "lightscribe-labeler".
The latter two are not in AUR4 yet, so package search doesn't find them. 4l has lightscribe in its description. > Assumed for AUR 3 PKGBUILDs were available for 32-bit and 64-bit > architecture, there were requests to make those split PKGBUILDs one > for both architectures, does it make sense to provide the PKGBUILDs > for AUR 4 with dropped 64-bit architecture and to provide 32-bit > architecture only? > > We could argue that it's better somebody maintains 32-bit PKGBUILDs > only, instead of completely dropping software, OTOH Arch claims > to support 32-bit and 64-bit architecture and it looks like a step > backwards to provide 32-bit architecture and to drop the newer 64-bit > architecture. You can (and should) use separate source arrays, nowadays, so what do you mean by split packages? Best, Marcel
