> > Several notification emails were sent directly rather than via aur-general. > > Yes, but that isn't the same thing. Being subscribed to the list would (should?) have made people aware of most of the issues surrounding the migration, including the motivations behind it and the expectations of maintainers.
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion o... David Phillips
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion o... Justin Dray
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion o... David Kaylor
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of or... Antonio Rojas
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packag... Simon Hanna
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Johannes Dewender
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphane... Ivy Foster
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR... Lukas Fleischer
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages o... David Kaylor
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packag... Daniel Micay
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... David Kaylor
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages o... Doug Newgard
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packag... Rob McCathie
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Justin Dray
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphane... Bruno Pagani
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packag... Lukas Fleischer
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Sam S.
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Giancarlo Razzolini
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Doug Newgard
- Re: [aur-general] Deletion of orphaned pa... Doug Newgard
