On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:17:12 -0300 Giancarlo Razzolini <[email protected]> wrote:
> Em 12-08-2015 14:10, Jens Adam escreveu: > > That wasn't what happened. Read the thread(s) again - a single TU went > > around and deleted a bunch of freshly orphaned packages, nothing to do > > with the migration. > > I really don't see the issue here, even if is this that happened. They > were orphaned, weren't they? And, they aren't deleted, they are > "hidden". Unless the TU also removed the git repository, which I believe > didn't happened. Truth is, the disown functionality has been misused and > you can't really complain if you orphaned a package and it was deleted. > Even more now that AUR has a co-maintainer functionality. > > Cheers, > Giancarlo Razzolini Just because they were orphaned doesn't mean they weren't useful. You don't see anything wrong with deleting a package a couple of hours after a maintainer orphans it? They were deleted in the sense that they are no longer generally available, and all comments, notifications, and votes are gone for good. Doug
