On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 20:50 +0100, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > On 28/11, Mark Weiman wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 15:16 +0100, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > > > They had 2 months to migrate their packages, and they were told > > > about > > > it, and the fact that it would be happening has been talked about > > > on > > > this ML since December last year, and was emailed about it before > > > the > > > 2 > > > months started. In what way is that not plenty of time and ample > > > warning? > > > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but I also think I remember something > > about a > > period of time if the maintainer didn't migrate it, it became fair > > game. If that was the case, if a package didn't make it to the aur4 > > during that time, there was not much interest in it. > > > > If my memory isn't failing me, it was two months total, the first > > was > > only maintainers from aur3, and the second was anyone who wanted to > > move some over. > > You're not wrong, but how is this relevant? > >
Just further saying that there was plenty of opportunity that someone could have moved a package to the new version. Mark Weiman
