LW, nope, there only is a 32-bit version available (which works fine on 64-bit).
This isn't really a binary, but it contains CUPS executable filters. Should I still tag it as -bin? I have checked the other printer drivers and they don't use this naming scheme. Peter On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Tobler <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply, here the amended version (including > systemd restart of the cups service): > > PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/pastes/10653442/text?key=pfryf0g6mecwu5nyd64a > install: http://pastie.org/private/coqawo5r7xaiviekh39iq > > Am I ready to go? > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Doug Newgard <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100 >> Peter Tobler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, and happy holidays, >>> >>> I am about to upload the PKGBUILD for the Dell 2155cn/cdn printer >>> driver and thought someone should take a look at it before I submit. >>> Please let me know if you spot any mistakes or find there are >>> improvements that should be made. >>> >>> Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD: >>> http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Peter >> >> There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore, >> pacman supports architecture specific arrays now (depends_i686, etc). >> >> bsdtar will extract rpm files, no reason to pull in rpmextract. >> >> Make sure you quote any paths that include any variables that you don't >> control, like ${pkgdir} and ${srcdir}.
