Hi, > On 13.02.2016, at 11:09, William Di Luigi <[email protected]> wrote: > It's important to note: this is just the opinion of Ralf and Pedro.
that's a misunderstanding. I don't know if Det has got a problem. Det seems to behave strange regarding impressions from Dave and Pedro, but I don't know an evidence that Det does or does not. What I noticed is that users considered the comments as a discussion and support forum and I don't know how to value Det comments. > I agree with taking a look at packages (I would add a "Flag as > compromised/virus" link, which has a similar effect to "Flag package > out-of-date"). Less is more... > I believe it would be a good thing to address (with a code of conduct) > *the possibility* of having misbehaving maintainers pressuring other > maintainers. It's important to note, however, that this "pressuring" > hasn't ever happened, until someone proves it happened. ....less is more.... ....I guess we should add a few notes to the guideline Wikis, we even don't need a CoC. Right now I don't have a good idea what exactly to add to the guideline Wikis. Regards, Ralf
