Em, yes, that's exactly what I did before, but I'm much too tired after having to identify which lines are installing the main content and which are not and remove them correctly, every time I got an update. (I'm a little bit paranoid that I don't want to ignore any package update. Also by doing so I'll possibly miss aur upstream changes such as added/removed dependencies or fixed bugs in those extra files.) So I decided to create these packages.
I've read the rules of submission section beforehand, and here are my reasons for submission: - Such way of leaving /opt/ out of pacman (and other extra files in /usr/ managed) is a preference I believe a number of people will find useful. Leaving /opt/ out of pacman can be useful because Android SDK and Android Studio has their internal update mechanism that can do patched/resumable upgrade which is important for people with lowspeed/unstable access to Google; Using a package to keep the dependency on other packages (ncurses, swt, etc) and system configuation files (profile scripts, systemd units, pixmaps and desktop files) are also desirable and recommended because a lot of the files reside in /usr/. - Manually doing such work upon every installation of each of these packages is a tedious process because one has to be at least familiar with bash scripting to identify exactly the part for installing the main content, and even so it takes a lot of time everytime. - These changes cannot be incorporated into the original packages because there are other people who have the broadband connection and prefer to manage all their files by pacman; it is not a duplicate. Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]>于2016年4月9日周六 下午5:31写道： > On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:08:44 +0200, 张海 wrote: > > Emm... Because I don't want to download those large source files when > > building, and I don't want to add additional lines to my pacman.conf. > > Anyway I think this should have the same reason as the fake packages in > > aur; they give users a shortcut for achieving what they feel better. > > Btw. I'm not sure if it's possible to add a directory instead of a file to > "NoExtract", OTOH after downloading the PKGBUILD a user who doesn't want > to install everything, easily could edit the package build, either before > running makepkg or e.g. continuing with yaourt. > > Maybe your "dummy" offends > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines. > > Regards, > Ralf > > PS: That reminds me that I still need to replace a long comment by a link > and that I again need to inform a maintainer about a mistake, regarding > the git version s/he should use. IOW we sometimes make mistakes, so there > might be already duplicated packages and/or empty packages provided by > AUR, but I guess this should not continue. However, perhaps I > misunderstand the guidelines. > -- 张海 浙江大学 计算机科学与技术 Blog: http://blog.zhanghai.me/ Github: https://github.com/DreaminginCodeZH
