Hello Alad, Hello Dan Thank you very much for your ideas. I just pushed a new version of the PKGBUILD here:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=qjournalctl Are there further improvements? The point with the substitutions of $pkgver seems very handy to me! Thank you! Dan B via aur-general <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa., 13. Aug. 2016 um 21:58 Uhr: > Remove the "make -j 9" line. I'll review the rest in a sec > > On Aug 13, 2016 2:47 PM, "Patrick Eigensatz via aur-general" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello folks! > > > > I am a beginner in Arch packaging but I just came to a stable point > writing > > my small systemd journal analyzer and beeing a Arch user for some years > now > > I thought it would > > be a good exercise for me to write a PKGBUILD for my program and try to > > upload it to the AUR. > > > > It is now online @ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qjournalctl/ > > > > > > I followed the wiki guidelines > > @ > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_ > > Repository#Submitting_packages > > > > I read myself into the > > @ https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards > > and into > > @ https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD > > > > and I tried to follow all the suggestions there and I kept my PKGBUILD as > > tiny > > as possible. > > > > I also runned namcap to check my PKGBUILD respectively the generated > > package. > > As I had some dependencies (namely qt5-base and gcc-multilibs) I listed > > them in the PKGBUILD. > > > > > > I tried to have a look at other PKGBUILDs as well and to compare it to > mine > > but I could not find something which would really differ from my first > > trial. > > > > Then I read I could ask here for suggestions and improvements. > > Is there something I didn't do which is e.g. a good habit? Or did I > > something that I shouldn't have done? > > > > > > I hope some experienced AUR packagers / TUs can give me a few points I > can > > work on. Feel free to give me feedback on my program as well! ;) > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > Patrick > > >
