On 11/13/2016 03:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote: > Why helloooooooooooooooooooo, > > Since the maintainer is throwing his tantrum, I decided it would be good > to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed > to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"? > > This would be more in line with the official package extra/flashplugin > [2] and also the source URL of the thing itself. > > What do you think? > > [1] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pepper-flash/ > > [2] = https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/flashplugin/ > > Det >
So, in the mailing list you give your actual reasoning, *after* giving a cryptic comment in the AUR comments and being rejected, and rightly so, as a crank. And now you will sling mud at the pepper-flash maintainer. I have no opinion about the package itself (I certainly do not see the apparent obviousness of your position), but purely regarding your behavior, I desperately want you to remain unhappy. -- Eli Schwartz