Le 08/01/2017 à 22:55, Eli Schwartz via aur-general a écrit : > On 01/08/2017 04:35 PM, Bruno Pagani via aur-general wrote: >> started partially because someone didn’t took it[0], but here see Eli >> and Doug comments, this is really unnecessary. ;) > Would this be a bad time to say that my personal style of choice is to > over-quote? :p
Well, in that case, I’ll call only to Doug. ;p > All I said was "appeal to authority" == fail because you can get gurus > to say whatever you want. It's a very subjective bikeshed. > > As long as you *do* use quotes in circumstances where you *can* get > unpredictable user input containing spaces (or nothing of course!) it > really doesn't matter what you do the rest of the time. > It is a style preference. You’re absolutely right. :) My own preference goes to less chars, and thus making sure I know what I’m doing. ;) But I’m OK with people over-quoting, like you said it’s under-quoting which is an issue. I was just applying a second layer of “there is nothing to be feared here in the absence of quotes”. Bruno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
