This would probably be best posted to the package page for the python2-intelhex package. The mailing list isn't really for issues with individual packages.
FYI, removing the bin on python2 will be so that you can install both packages side-by-side without conflicts, but the python3 will be the default one used as a binary on the path. On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 at 11:49 Quentin Bourgeois <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently looking for building python2-intelhex[0] from > AUR. Unfortunately the build failed, while I am using aursync[1] and > require build into a clean (created for this build) chroot: > > $ aursync -c python2-intelhex > [...] > ==> Starting package_python-intelhex()... > /startdir/PKGBUILD: line 17: python: command not found > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package_python-intelhex(). > Aborting... > ==> ERROR: Build failed, check /var/lib/aurbuild/x86_64/user/build > > Note that with the python3 package version I come up with the same > bug. > Thus, I decide to have a look at the PKGBUILD and suggest some > modifications I guess the maintainer will be glad to merge any > proposal, but did the community see any thing more to change ? > Basically I made use a lot more of its internal variable __pkgname, > define python{,2}-setuptools as makedepends and add the license file > to the package. > > In another way I don't really understand the rm on the bin directory? > The problem I saw is that only installing python2-intelhex wont allow > the use of the provided scripts[2]. However, I conducted small > tests and they seems to works even with python2. So my guess is to > create an other AUR PKGBUILD that will perform pretty the same things > but only packaging the provided scripts, let call this package > python-intelhex-scripts. Then, one need to enforce a dependencies of > python{,2}-intelhex with python-intelhex-script at the same upstream > release version. > > I propose some modification in the python-intelhex[3] PKGBUILD and a > new PKGBUILD for python-intelhex-scripts[4]. > > What do you think ? > > Thanks in advance for your feedback! > > [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-intelhex/ > [1] https://github.com/AladW/aurutils > [2] https://github.com/bialix/intelhex/tree/master/scripts > [3] > https://git.bourgeois.eu/aur_python_intelhex.git/tree/PKGBUILD?id=e6187787c3743e63c5830f78dd18d58f5bc40f79 > [4] > https://git.bourgeois.eu/aur_python_intelhex_scripts.git/tree/PKGBUILD?id=b346e34509a53cd0ed094f686f635d7e3873a372 >
